Pissed Off Trey Gowdy Just Made A Promise To Scandalous Susan Rice That Could End In Her Arrest TOMORROW

2313

Representative Trey Gowdy is one person in Washington D.C.that I would never want to go head to head with. Apparently, I am not the only one who feels that way since Susan Rice has declined to appear before Congress next week. Let me back this up and give you the whole story of what is happening now in the Susan Rice coverup.

As you remember it was discovered last month, that Susan Rice requested that the NSA unmask the names of Donald Trump and his officials during the election. Of course, this is horrible news for Rice since this stunning information could send her to prison for a very long time.

However, it only gets worse for Obama’s former National Security Advisor.

Here at Freedom Daily, we reported that computer logs that showed that Rice had accessed numerous intelligence reports during Obama’s last seven months of office. Who was Rice checking on? No other than Trump and his associates.

What makes this even more interesting is that these reports show when Rice first began to “unmask” private citizens identities. It should come as no surprise that it was right around last July which is about the time that Trump secured the GOP nomination.

Shortly, after the initial unmasking, it only began to accelerate from there and continued on into January. And, what makes this even more devastating for the democrats is that even with all of Rice’s shady tactics nothing negative was found on Donald Trump.

So, it only stands to reason that this would be investigated considering that this was a huge breach of privacy. Susan Rice was requested to testify before Congress next week on the question of unmasking Trump aides and officials. Instead of jumping at the chance to clear the air and answer burning questions she declined the invitation.

 

According to Daily Caller:

Host Bill Hemmer asked the South Carolina Republican what he thought about Rice refusing an invitation to testify about Russia hacking and the unmasking of Trump campaign officials.

 “There are other ways to invite people other than via a letter,” Gowdy asserted. “There are things called subpoenas. You shouldn’t have to use them with a former national security advisor, but if you do, you do.”

The representative from South Carolina said that Rice is a “very important witness.”

“Members of Congress don’t pick the witnesses, lawyers don’t pick witnesses…facts pick the witnesses,” he stated.

Watch the video here.

Also, Trey Gowdy was not the only one who had something to say about Rice failing to appear before Congress. President Trump logged onto Twitter and had this to say about Rice’s arrogant move.

 


 


 

The question I am sure that is on everyone’s mind is, why did she decline to testify? Well, the “little flower” said that the letter she received wasn’t a “bipartisan letter,” and that the ranking member hadn’t signed it.

From Free Beacon:

Rice’s lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, sent a letter Wednesday on behalf of her client to the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism–Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.), respectively–explaining why Rice was declining an invitation to testify.

“Senator Whitehouse has informed us by letter that he did not agree to Chairman Graham’s invitation to Ambassador Rice, a significant departure from the bipartisan invitations extended to other witnesses. Under these circumstances, Ambassador Rice respectfully declines Senator Graham’s invitation to testify,” Ruemmler wrote.

So, basically what Rice is saying is that the letter wasn’t “fair” enough? I mean, really? What makes matters worse for Rice is that even the crypt keeper, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said that she has never heard of a letter having to be bipartisan. And, that Rice has already appeared on numerous cable shows speaking on the subject.

Watch Feinstein here.

I mean shouldn’t Rice want to help the investigation and clear her name? I guess that is what I would think, but I suppose she is protecting many other people who are involved.

Well, if I were Rice I would not get too comfortable now that Trey Gowdy is on the case. If there is one thing we all know about Gowdy is that he will always seek the truth. If I were Rice I would just plan on testifying because if Gowdy gets it his way you will end up behind bars for a long time.

What do you think about Trey Gowdy’s reaction to Susan Rice? Let us know in the comments below!